Pot committed falacy8/15/2023 ![]() ![]() Take the situation of opposing factions building toward conflict who make declarations suggesting a particular action or advancement necessarily removes peaceful alternatives. It isn’t exactly the same, but being pot committed is sometimes likened to reaching a kind of “point of no return” such as might arise other contexts. Such a situation is determined by pot odds and how those odds compare to your chances of winning a hand. Generally speaking, being pot committed means having arrived at a point in a poker hand at which folding to any bet or raise has become an incorrect play. But it’s one well worth learning, particularly when playing “big bet” games like no-limit hold’em and pot-limit Omaha in which bets on successive streets can quickly transform a small skirmish into major melee. It’s a concept many think they understand, but sometimes they misapply it or are mistaken. ISBN 9781841697413.One of the more commonly uttered justifications for suspect decisions in poker is for players to claim they were “pot committed” in a hand when in they really weren’t. Thinking and Reasoning: An Introduction to the Psychology of Reason, Judgment and Decision Making. "Top 10: Football superstitions to rival Arsenal's Kolo Toure". Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments (3rd ed.). "Post hoc ergo propter hoc : some benefits of rationalization". Wider Das Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc - Primary Source Edition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |